Derivation
of the particle coordinate path equation.
The
derivation of the particle path is somewhat more involved and the reader is
referred to the mathpages
derivation by Kevin Brown. As far as I can tell the derivation is correct
except that Kevin Brown succumbs to the usual temptation to insert an ad-hoc
absolute function so that the result agree with the
accepted traditional physical interpretation. These are the final corrected
steps shown below.
Starting
with:
![t = \sqrt{{R \over 2m} -1}\left[\left( {R \over 2} +2m \right)\alpha + \left(R \over 2\right) sin(\alpha)}\right] - 4m\sqrt{-1}\,\,arctan\left(cos(\alpha)-1 \over sin(\alpha)\sqrt{1-R/2m} \right)](ParticleDerivation_files/image001.gif)
Substituting
the equation
becomes:
![]()
Substituting
the identity
we get
![]()
Now
the final substitution of
gives:
![]()
and not
as claimed by Kevin Brown.
The
alpha variable that appears in the particle equation is a parametric variable.
It can be removed to give a normal Cartesian equation by noting that mathpages
gives the radial part of the proper motion of a particle as r=R(1+cos(alpha))/2 which is easily solved to give alpha = acos(2r/R-1) which is the form used in the applets.
The
derivation by Kevin Brown of the particle motion in terms of proper time
appears to be correct and can be seen in the link given above.
(c)2008 KevPegrume.
dt = dT - 2m dr/(r-2m) in equation
13.4